|
|
Post by akinlaw on Aug 27, 2012 0:01:55 GMT -5
a. Write your own definition of primary sources and secondary sources.
b. Which type of source (primary or secondary) do you think historians value more? Why?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Lee on Aug 27, 2012 14:31:57 GMT -5
A primary source is something that was there
secondary source is something that was not there but knows about it
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Lee on Aug 29, 2012 14:45:20 GMT -5
what do i respond to?  |
|
|
|
Post by akinlaw on Aug 30, 2012 14:32:01 GMT -5
Yes, Brandon, a primary source is written by someone who was there, while a secondary source is a combination of primary sources. Which type of source, primary or secondary, do you think is most valuable to researchers?
|
|
